**

Comparative Survey, Descriptive Research

  Comparative survey research is a type of descriptive survey where it aims to compare the status of two or more variable, institutions, strategies etc. This technique often uses multiple disciplines in one study.This does not only compare different groups but also same group over time.Few points are to be kept in mind before starting the comparative survey. ·        Comparison Points -The research should be very clear regarding the points to be compared. This can also be identified through review of literature and experience of experts. ·        Assumption of Similarities -  One has to be clear about the similarities the two variable hold. If the researcher do not find this there is no point of comparison. Criteria of Comparison - The researcher has to identify the criteria of comparison keeping in mind the fairness and objectivity. Appropriate tools has to be identified for measurement of criterion variables. Comparative survey research is carried on when the researcher cannot

Aziz-Fielding Relationship in Forster’s A PASSAGE TO INDIA

Theme         Critical analysis           Race and Gender


Edward Morgan Forster (1879-1970) an intellectual and Fellow of King’s College, Cambridge ranked among the most cosmopolitan men of his day. His novels are only five in number. After the early Where Angels Fear to Tread, with its well drawn characters, its comedy and the typical concern with the conflict between two different cultures comes The Longest Journey – a less attractive work that shows the same skill of characterization. A Room with a View like his first novel is set in Italy containing delicately handled excellent comedy. Next comes, his two masterpieces, Howards End and much later A Passage to India. Both deal with the misunderstandings that arise in relationships among individuals in one case and among races in the other.
            
A Passage to India is the latest of his novels and is unrivalled in English fiction in its presentation of the complex problems which were to be found in the relationships between English and native people in India. Forster uses personal relationships as a yardstick to measure the failings and achievements of his characters. The relationship between Aziz and Fielding is the most significant. In spite of so many barriers of race and character, the two men succeed in creating a unique rapport that stands out as evidence of the power of goodwill and kindness.

The difference between the two men can be noticed in their first meeting. Fielding appears as a genial, reserved, liberal and mature person who is full of goodwill and consideration. On the other hand, Aziz is impulsive and unreserved man given to extreme of love and jealousy, affection and rancour. At the tea party, unlike Fielding, Aziz throws shyness and reserve to the winds and becomes gay and exuberant. This contrast in temperament can be seen in the following lines:

Fielding says, emotions should be in proportion to their objects. To this Aziz retorts,

Is emotion a sack of potatoes, so much the pound, to be measured out? Am I a machine? I shall be told I can use up my emotions by using them, next.

Also, there is the difficulty of communication due to Aziz’s imperfect handling of the English language. For instance, Fielding’s casual remark, Please make yourself at home, is misunderstood by Aziz as a signal for unconventional behaviour.

In spite of these fundamental differences of culture and temperament, the two enter into a genuine friendship that dissolves the various barriers between them. Fielding is struck by the liveliness exhibited by the youthful Aziz on the entrance of ladies and encourages his eloquence. To this, Aziz is overwhelmed and gratifies the warmth and affection extended by Fielding. On their second meeting, Aziz gratefully appreciates Fielding’s gesture of coming in his house hearing of his illness. He tries to repay the moving action of friendship. He shows Fielding his dead wife’s photograph.

Though Fielding shows himself deeply moved by Aziz’s noble gesture, he realizes he is unable to bring the same amount of emotion to their relationship. At this stage, we notice the complications underlying the instinctive and impulsive understanding reached between the both. Aziz was highly imaginative and Fielding has an undeveloped imagination. The latter cannot surrender whole-heartedly to any new person or experience as his friend did. He finds it difficult to believe that kindness alone can solve India’s problems. It was due to these reasons; the gesture of friendship, while deeply appreciated by Fielding also puts him off slightly from Aziz. However, Aziz’s former admiration of the Englishman is replaced; he says,

No Englishman understands except Mr. Fielding.

These misunderstandings and complications do not have place in the earlier part of the novel because of the trust they have on each other. They creep in their relation when they are celebrating the success of their friendship which has survived Aziz’s arrest and his trial. Imprisonment changes Aziz; while remaining good-tempered and affectionate he has become formidable so that he is determined to take revenge upon Adela for ruining his career. Fielding, moved by the pity of helpless Adela urges Aziz of not doing so but the latter is determined. This revengeful attitude disgraces Fielding. He says,

It disgraces me to have been mentioned in connexion with such a hag.

This led Aziz to believe that Fielding is pleading for Adela because he wants to marry her for her money. This suspicious nature was a part of his personality as such, leads him to break with Fielding.

After two years, we find Aziz again a man with a difference. He is now an implacable enemy of the British and has cast his lot with Indian nationalism too firmly to think of reunion with his former friend. However, Ralph Moore (son of Mrs. Moore) by the power of his mysterious personality forces Aziz against his will to forget his hatred for British. At Mau, the collision of Aziz’s boat with Fielding on the river in an atmosphere of joyous celebration of Lord Krishna festival releases his spirit and he is friends with Fielding again, all misunderstandings removed, suspicion dissolved. They revive all their former affection. Yet, they realize that their characters and outlook have changed radically. Fielding is now siding with Anglo-India and Aziz with Indian nationalism. They cannot continue their friendship under these circumstances. It can be said that their former personal understanding was too fragile to be maintained under all circumstances.

Therefore, in the relationship between Aziz and Fielding Forster shows us the complex tensions between East and West and the difficulties of human communication which ultimately intervene and make it impossible to continue a relationship formed between such different human beings.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Justify the Title ‘Heart of Darkness’ by Joseph Conrad

Character Sketch of KURTZ in Heart Of Darkness

Bring out the Autobiographical Elements in Sons and Lovers

Short Note on RASA and DHVANI

Justification of the Title LOOK BACK IN ANGER