Poetic Diction Dissociation of Sensibility
Colonialism
Objective Correlative
is a term introduced by T.S.Eliot in his essay Hamlet and his Problems
(1919). His doctrine of poetic impersonality finds its most classical
formulation. He says,
The only way of
expressing emotion in the form of art is by finding an ‘objective correlative’;
in other words a set of objects, a situation, a chain of events which shall be
the formula of that particular emotion, such that when the external facts,
which must terminate in sensory experience, are given, the emotion is immediately
evoked.
According to him the
writer cannot communicate his emotions directly to the readers, he has to find
some object suggestive of it and only then he can evoke the same emotion in his
readers. It is through objective correlative that the transaction between
author and the reader takes place. Eliot illustrates this by giving examples
from Shakespeare’s successful plays. Considering Macbeth, you will find
that the state of mind of Lady Macbeth walking in her sleep has been
communicated by a skilful accumulation of imagined sensory impressions. He says
that in Lady Macbeth’s sleepwalking scene, and in speech that Macbeth makes
when he hears of his wife’s death, the words are completely adequate to the
state of mind. Eliot ascribes the alleged artistic failure of the play Hamlet
to the fact that Shakespeare had been unable to find a proper chain of events
or set of words to evoke the emotions. The protagonist Hamlet is
dominated by an emotion which is inexpressible, because it is in access of the
facts as they appear.
However, the term first
appears with a different meaning in the American aesthetician Washington
Allston’s Lectures on Art (1850), to suggest the relation between
the mind and the external world. This notion was enlarged upon by George
Santayana in Interpretations of Poetry and Religion (1900), where
he suggested that correlative objects could not only express a poet’s feeling
but also evoke it. Eliot was probably influenced by the latter.
Before Eliot, Ezra
Pound and T.E.Hulme too approached the problem of artistic representation.
Pound says, Poetry provides equations like mathematics, but equations for
emotions. T.E.Hulme in his Lecture on Modern Poetry says,
The poet is moved by a certain landscape, he selects from that certain
images which, put into juxtaposition in separate lines serve to suggest and
evoke the state he feels.
According to Eliot, the
artist presents the ‘formula’ of a particular emotion. There is an ‘exact
equivalence’ between an object or situation and the emotion it is supposed to
evoke. The emotion can only be evoked and it cannot be expressed directly. He
was concerned with the problems of artistic expression. The poet/writer has to transmute
his personal and private agonies into something rich and strange, something
universal and impersonal, and this can be done by finding an objective
correlative.
However, Eliot’s
formulation has often been criticised for falsifying the way a poet/writer
actually writes. Since, no object or situation is in itself ‘a formula’ for an
emotion but depends in an expression and emotional significance and in a way it
is rendered by the poet/writer.
Comments
Post a Comment